Electron Transfer Mediators | Diabetic Supply Rescue
History & Major Events

Electron Transfer Mediators

Electron Transfer Mediators were the chemistry that let diabetic test strips move from clinical labs to home use. Early First Generation sensors relied on oxygen in the blood, so readings shifted with oxygen levels (the 'Oxygen Deficit'), and they needed high voltages at which drugs like acetaminophen (Tylenol) could interfere.

Second Generation sensors replaced oxygen with synthetic mediators, primarily Ferricyanide (LifeScan) and Ferrocene (MediSense), which made readings independent of oxygen. TheraSense (Abbott) and Roche later introduced Osmium and Ruthenium complexes, sometimes tethered to polymers ('wired enzymes'). These work at lower electrical potentials, which reduces interference from common blood substances without eliminating it, and they are one part of how strips meet the accuracy criteria in ISO 15197.

Diabetic Supply Rescue Editorial Team
3 min read
Last updated: October 09, 2026
Advanced
12 glossary terms
6 citations

Electron Transfer Mediators: Revolutionizing [Diabetic Test Strips](/sell-diabetic-supplies/)

An electron transfer mediator is a small molecule on a test strip that carries electrons from the glucose-reacting enzyme to the strip's electrode, where the meter reads them as current [1]. Mediators are a big part of why glucose testing could leave the clinical lab. They freed the reaction from its dependence on oxygen in the blood and let strips run at lower voltages [1].

First Generation Sensors

Early glucose sensors used oxygen from the blood to carry electrons. The enzyme glucose oxidase turned glucose and oxygen into gluconic acid and hydrogen peroxide, and the sensor measured either the oxygen used up or the peroxide produced [1]. That design had two weak spots. Oxygen dissolves poorly in blood, so its level fluctuated, a limit researchers called the "oxygen deficit" [1]. Measuring peroxide also took a high operating potential (the voltage applied to the electrode), and at that voltage other substances in blood, including ascorbic acid (vitamin C), uric acid and some drugs, reacted at the electrode too and inflated the signal [1]. Acetaminophen (Tylenol) is a well-documented case: at high doses it is oxidized directly at the electrode and pushes the glucose reading up [1].

Second Generation Sensors

Second-generation sensors replaced oxygen with synthetic mediators. The enzyme hands its electrons to the mediator; the electrode then reoxidizes the mediator, which produces the measured current and readies the mediator for another round [1]. Ferrocene and ferricyanide became the usual choices for self-monitoring strips [1]. When we read why ferrocene caught on, the reasons were practical: it doesn't react with oxygen, and it stays stable whether oxidized or reduced [1]. The first electrochemical meter for home self-testing, MediSense's pen-sized ExacTech, launched in 1987 with a ferrocene derivative [1].

Advanced Mediators

Later designs turned to metal complexes that work at lower potentials. TheraSense, now part of Abbott Diabetes Care, built its FreeStyle meter (available from 2000) around the enzyme glucose dehydrogenase and an osmium mediator with a formal potential between 0.0 and -0.2 V, measured against the strip's silver/silver chloride electrode [2]. The same team "wired" glucose oxidase to the electrode with an osmium complex bound to a polymer. That approach went into a sensor worn under the skin rather than a strip: the FreeStyle Navigator CGM, which became available in the US in 2008 [2]. Hexaammineruthenium(III), a ruthenium complex, is another mediator strip designers value for its low redox potential and its stability in storage [3].

Lower potentials reduce interference. They don't remove it. The TheraSense team reported that the substances that often interfere did not affect FreeStyle readings at their normal physiological levels [4], and that qualifier matters. Interference testing is still part of FDA clearance: in its 2010 decision summary for Abbott's FreeStyle Lite strips, the FDA noted that xylose interfered above 6 mg/dL and that the strip insert warns against using the system during xylose absorption testing [5].

Mediator chemistry is one ingredient in accuracy, not the whole recipe. ISO 15197:2013, the international accuracy standard for blood glucose meters, requires at least 95% of results to fall within ±15 mg/dL of a laboratory reference below 100 mg/dL and within ±15% at or above 100 mg/dL, with at least 99% in zones A and B of the consensus error grid [6]. Whether a meter meets that bar also depends on factors no mediator controls, such as hematocrit (the share of blood made up of red cells), temperature and humidity [1].

References

  1. Glucose biosensors: an overview of use in clinical practice (Yoo EH, Lee SY. Sensors (Basel) 2010;10(5):4558-4576)Source
  2. Electrochemistry in diabetes management (Heller A, Feldman B. Acc Chem Res 2010;43(7):963-973)Source
  3. Engineered fungus derived FAD-dependent glucose dehydrogenase with acquired ability to utilize hexaammineruthenium(III) as an electron acceptor (Okurita M et al. Bioelectrochemistry 2018;123:62-69)Source
  4. FreeStyle: a small-volume electrochemical glucose sensor for home blood glucose testing (Feldman B et al. Diabetes Technol Ther 2000;2(2):221-229)Source
  5. FDA 510(k) Decision Summary K092602: FreeStyle Lite and FreeStyle Freedom Lite Blood Glucose Monitoring SystemsSource
  6. System Accuracy and User Performance Evaluation of an Improved System for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (Baumstark A et al. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2018;12(2):407-411)Source

Was this article helpful?

Explore More Topics

Continue your research with related categories