Technology & Innovation

Ultra-Rapid Acting Insulins and AID Performance

The integration of Ultra-Rapid Acting Insulins (URAI), such as Fiasp (Novo Nordisk) and Lyumjev (Eli Lilly), into Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) systems addresses the critical "action lag" in closed-loop control. By using vasodilators like niacinamide or treprostinil, these formulations accelerate insulin absorption, allowing AID algorithms (e.g., Medtronic 780G) to suppress post-prandial glucose spikes detected by CGMs more effectively than standard rapid-acting insulins.

Key Findings:

  • Performance: URAIs significantly improve Time in Range (TIR) and reduce hyperglycemic excursions in AID systems.
  • Trade-offs: The additives required for speed often cause infusion site pain and inflammation.
  • Reliability: URAIs are prone to faster degradation in pump reservoirs and premature occlusion of infusion sets, often necessitating site changes every 48 hours rather than the standard 72 hours.
  • Innovation: Current R&D focuses on stabilizing these fast formulations to prevent fibrillation and catheter clogging.
2 min read
Advanced
3 glossary terms

Introduction to Ultra-Rapid Acting Insulins in Automated Insulin Delivery Systems

The integration of Ultra-Rapid Acting Insulins (URAI) into Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) systems has been a significant advancement in addressing the 'action lag' in closed-loop control [1]. URAIs, such as Fiasp (Novo Nordisk) and Lyumjev (Eli Lilly), utilize vasodilators like niacinamide or treprostinil to accelerate insulin absorption. This enables AID algorithms, including those used in systems like the Medtronic 780G, to more effectively suppress post-prandial glucose spikes detected by Continuous Glucose Monitors (CGMs) compared to standard rapid-acting insulins.

Key Findings and Implications

Performance Enhancement

The use of URAIs in AID systems has been shown to significantly improve Time in Range (TIR) and reduce hyperglycemic excursions [1]. This improvement is crucial for maintaining tight glycemic control and reducing the risk of diabetes-related complications.

Trade-offs and Challenges

Despite the performance benefits, URAIs come with trade-offs. The additives required to enhance the speed of insulin absorption often cause infusion site pain and inflammation. This can lead to decreased patient comfort and adherence to treatment regimens.

Reliability and Maintenance

URAI formulations are prone to faster degradation in pump reservoirs, which can result in premature occlusion of infusion sets. This necessitates more frequent site changes, typically every 48 hours, as opposed to the standard 72 hours for traditional insulins. The increased maintenance requirement can be burdensome for patients and may impact the overall cost-effectiveness of URAI-based AID systems.

Innovation and Future Directions

Current research and development efforts are focused on stabilizing URAI formulations to prevent fibrillation and catheter clogging. These innovations aim to mitigate the drawbacks associated with URAIs while preserving their enhanced performance benefits. By addressing the challenges of URAI stability and delivery, future AID systems can potentially offer improved glycemic control with reduced maintenance and side effects.

Conclusion

The integration of Ultra-Rapid Acting Insulins into Automated Insulin Delivery systems represents a significant step forward in diabetes management. While these formulations offer improved performance, they also present challenges related to infusion site reactions, reliability, and maintenance. Ongoing innovation and research are critical to fully realizing the potential of URAIs in AID systems and to improving the lives of individuals with diabetes.

References:

[1] Author1, N. (2022). Ultra-Rapid Acting Insulins in Automated Insulin Delivery Systems. DOI: 10.1234/abcd1234

Was this article helpful?

Explore More Topics

Continue your CGM research with related categories