Introduction to Implantable Fluorescence Sensors: Eversense E3
The Eversense E3, developed by Senseonics, is a pioneering innovation in implantable fluorescence-based continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology. This system diverges from traditional enzymatic sensors, such as those offered by Dexcom and Abbott, which typically have a lifespan of 10 to 14 days. Instead, the Eversense system utilizes a subcutaneous implant that contains a fluorescent phenylboronic acid polymer. This polymer reacts to glucose levels and is powered inductively by a removable external transmitter [1].
Key Features and Differentiators
- Longevity: The Eversense E3 boasts a wear duration of 6 months (180 days), significantly extending the duration between sensor replacements compared to traditional CGM systems.
- Accuracy: Clinical studies, such as the PROMISE Study, have reported a Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) of approximately 8.5%, indicating a high level of accuracy in glucose level measurements [2].
- Alerts: The system provides on-body vibration alerts via the transmitter, ensuring that users are promptly notified of critical glucose level changes.
Critical Considerations and Pitfalls
- Interference: It has been observed that certain substances, including Tetracycline antibiotics and Mannitol, can cause interference with the sensor, leading to falsely high readings [3].
- Procedure: The implantation and removal of the Eversense sensor require a surgical procedure, which may pose additional risks and considerations for patients.
- Form Factor: While the implant itself is subcutaneous, the current design still necessitates the use of an external transmitter that must be worn over the implant site, which may impact user comfort and aesthetics.
Conclusion
The Eversense E3 represents a significant advancement in CGM technology, offering extended wear duration and high accuracy. However, it is crucial for healthcare providers and patients to be aware of the potential pitfalls, including drug interferences, the need for surgical procedures, and the current form factor limitations. As technology continues to evolve, addressing these challenges will be key to improving user experience and expanding the adoption of implantable fluorescence sensors in diabetes management.
References
- Review of Implantable Fluorescence-Based Glucose MonitoringSource