Manufacturers & Products

Global Market Access and Reimbursement Models

Global market access for Continuous Glucose Monitors (CGMs) has transitioned from a niche medical necessity for Type 1 Diabetes to a broader standard of care for Type 2 Diabetes, driven by pivotal regulatory changes in 2023.

Key Reimbursement Drivers:

  • USA (CMS): The 2023 expansion of Medicare coverage to include basal-only insulin users and those with problematic hypoglycemia (regardless of insulin use) significantly expanded the Total Addressable Market (TAM). The shift from Durable Medical Equipment (DME) to Pharmacy Benefit channels has streamlined patient access and reduced friction.
  • Europe (HTA): Bodies like NICE (UK) and G-BA (Germany) have standardized coverage for T1D based on cost-utility analyses, validating that the higher upfront cost of sensors is offset by reduced long-term hospitalization costs.
  • Asia-Pacific: Australia's NDSS subsidy represents a successful single-payer model, providing universal T1D coverage while enforcing price controls.

Strategic Implications:

Manufacturers (Abbott, Dexcom, Medtronic) are now competing on economic evidence (cost-effectiveness) rather than just hardware features. The primary barrier to entry remains the high cost of clinical trials required to prove "Time in Range" benefits to payers, solidifying the market dominance of the existing oligopoly.

2 min read
Intermediate
4 glossary terms
3 citations

Introduction to Global Market Access and Reimbursement Models for Continuous Glucose Monitors

The global market for Continuous Glucose Monitors (CGMs) has undergone significant transformations, driven by regulatory changes and evolving standards of care for diabetes management. This section provides an overview of the current landscape of global market access and reimbursement models for CGMs.

Regulatory Framework and Reimbursement Drivers

The regulatory framework for CGMs varies by region, with key drivers influencing reimbursement decisions:

  • United States: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have expanded coverage for CGMs, including basal-only insulin users and individuals with problematic hypoglycemia [1]. This shift from categorizing CGMs as Durable Medical Equipment (DME) to considering them under Pharmacy Benefit channels has enhanced patient access.
  • Europe: Health Technology Assessment (HTA) bodies, such as the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the UK and the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) in Germany, have established coverage for Type 1 Diabetes based on cost-utility analyses [2].
  • Asia-Pacific: The National Diabetes Services Scheme (NDSS) in Australia exemplifies a successful single-payer model, offering universal coverage for Type 1 Diabetes while implementing price controls [3].

Strategic Implications for Manufacturers

The competitive landscape among CGM manufacturers (Abbott, Dexcom, Medtronic) has shifted towards emphasizing economic evidence (cost-effectiveness) in addition to hardware features [4]. Conducting clinical trials to demonstrate \

References

  1. CMS Ruling: Glucose Monitors (L33822)Source
  2. NICE Guideline [NG17]: Type 1 diabetes in adults: diagnosis and managementSource
  3. NDSS CGM Subsidy ExpansionSource

Was this article helpful?

Explore More Topics

Continue your CGM research with related categories