Biofouling and Foreign Body Response (FBR) Mitigation in Continuous Glucose Monitors
Introduction
The longevity and accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitors (CGMs) are limited by two major factors: Biofouling and the Foreign Body Response (FBR) [1]. Upon insertion, the body's natural response involves coating the sensor with proteins, followed by an immune cell attack (inflammation) and collagen encapsulation (fibrosis) [2]. This creates a barrier that delays glucose diffusion and consumes local oxygen, leading to signal drift and the "first-day dip" in accuracy [3].
Key Mitigation Strategies
Several strategies have been developed to mitigate the effects of biofouling and FBR:
- Passive Coatings: The use of Zwitterionic polymers and Hydrogels (e.g., PEG, phosphorylcholine) to create a hydration shell that resists protein adhesion [4].
- Active Release: Incorporation of Nitric Oxide (NO) donors to mimic blood vessels and Dexamethasone elution to suppress local inflammation [5].
- Membrane Engineering: Use of Nafion and mass-transport limiting layers to block interferents while regulating glucose/oxygen flux [6].
Challenges and Future Directions
Despite these innovations, the "run-in" period and eventual fibrous encapsulation remain the primary technical hurdles preventing long-term (30+ day) implantable sensors [7]. Further research is needed to overcome these challenges and develop more effective mitigation strategies.
References
References
- Zwitterionic hydrogels for the next generation of implantable medical devicesSource