Technology & Innovation

Coulometry vs. Amperometry in Biosensors

The two dominant electrochemical detection methods in diabetic test strips are Amperometry and Coulometry.

Amperometry, the industry standard (used by LifeScan, Roche), measures the current generated by glucose oxidation at a specific time point. It is fast but relies on the Cottrell equation, making it sensitive to diffusion rates, which are affected by temperature, blood viscosity (hematocrit), and electrode surface area variations.

Coulometry, pioneered by TheraSense (Abbott FreeStyle), measures the total charge accumulated over time (integral of current). Based on Faraday’s Law, it quantifies the absolute mass of glucose. This method allows for extremely small sample volumes (0.3 $\mu L$) and is inherently less sensitive to hematocrit and temperature variances. While Amperometry dominates due to manufacturing speed, Coulometry drove the industry shift toward sub-microliter, painless testing.

1 min read
Beginner
0 glossary terms
1 citations

Simplifying [Diabetic Test Strips](/sell-diabetic-supplies): Coulometry vs Amperometry

Diabetic test strips rely on two main methods: Amperometry and Coulometry.

  • Amperometry quickly measures the current from glucose oxidation.
  • Coulometry measures the total charge over time, providing a more accurate picture.

How They Work

Amperometry is fast but sensitive to temperature and blood viscosity.

Coulometry is more robust and works with tiny sample volumes.

Revolutionizing the Industry

TheraSense pioneered Coulometry with the FreeStyle monitor, using Faraday’s Law to quantify glucose [1].

LifeScan and Roche opted for Amperometry, relying on the Cottrell equation [2].

Key Takeaways

  • Coulometry: measures total charge, robust, and small sample volumes
  • Amperometry: measures current, fast, but sensitive to variations

References

  1. Coulometric biosensors: An overviewSource

Was this article helpful?

Explore More Topics

Continue your research with related categories